AMD EPYC 9754 vs. AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX Benchmarks

Add Processor To Compare:

* Note: Due to differences in Linux drivers/interfaces, the reported CPU clock may be displayed different depending upon the CPU - i.e. base vs. boost frequency.
* Disclosure: OpenBenchmarking.org may earn a commission/referral on affiliate shopping links should you decide to make any purchases from the third-party shopping links.

Of the components selected for comparison, there were 163 benchmarks in common (matching test profile, test version and any configurable test options) and where that data was statistically significant and at least three independent data points for each component of the public test results on OpenBenchmarking.org.

AMD EPYC 9754 128-Core had the most wins, coming in first place for 50% of the tests.

Based on the geometric mean of all complete results, the fastest (AMD EPYC 9754 128-Core) was 1.04x the speed of the slowest (AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX 96-Cores).

The results with the greatest spread from best to worst included: , Stress-NG (Test: x86_64 RdRand) at 3792.096x, WebP Image Encode (Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless) at 1.648x, WebP Image Encode (Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless, Highest Compression) at 1.625x, Liquid-DSP (Threads: 32 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512) at 1.591x, Liquid-DSP (Threads: 32 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32) at 1.547x, libavif avifenc (Encoder Speed: 0) at 1.518x, ASKAP (Test: tConvolve MT - Gridding) at 1.51x, libavif avifenc (Encoder Speed: 2) at 1.481x, Redis (Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 500) at 1.477x, Xmrig (Variant: GhostRider - Hash Count: 1M) at 1.473x.

163 Benchmarks Found In Common - Sort By: Greatest Spread